When families go through changes, such as a divorce or separation, the well-being of the children is always a top priority. In South Carolina, the courts play a significant role in safeguarding a child’s interests. This means they follow a child-centric approach. They aim to maintain the bond between children and their parents. This goes for both custodial and noncustodial parents—despite the changes in family dynamics.
However, there are times when a judge might decide that it’s best for a noncustodial parent to only see their child under supervision. So, when does this happen?
Evidence of abuse or harm can lead to supervision
Supervised visitation isn’t something that judges order lightly. It’s reserved for special situations where a child’s safety and well-being might be at risk. For example, the court will step in if there’s credible concern that a child’s physical, mental, moral or emotional health is at risk. This concern extends to cases involving allegations of abuse, neglect or substance abuse by the noncustodial or visiting parent. The courts then mandate supervised visitation to ensure the child’s protection while still upholding their right to have a relationship with both parents.
The child’s needs come first
The child’s safety is the most important concern, and supervised visitation ensures a secure environment during these interactions. It’s important to remember that supervised visitation is not meant to punish parents. On the contrary, it serves to protect children and their well-being. The ultimate goal is to nurture a healthy parent-child relationship that benefits all parties. While South Carolina courts—and courts in general—encourage both parents to be actively involved in their children’s lives, there are times when supervised visitation is necessary. Such decisions are always made after careful consideration, centered on the child’s best interests.
